Why is The Iliad a classic? November 10, 2010

Please welcome Terrence Hawkins, author of The Rage of Achilles, who is here to share his thoughts on why people are still interested in reading The Iliad after all these years.  Be sure to check out the bottom of this post for your chance to win a copy of The Rage of Achilles and another great book for yourself!

When I wrote about The Rage of Achilles a year ago I was focused—-typically enough—on my own experience of authorship.  That is, what it was like to retell a classic. But over the course of twelve months of readings and signings and reviews, favorable and otherwise, I’ve been struck by the enthusiasm the original still generates.  So now I’m interested by the opposite question—what makes a classic classic?  Why do people still care?  Why do they read it?

Let’s face it: there are a lot of obstacles between Homer and us.  His (or their) characters inhabit a world so completely different from our own that they might as well belong to another species.  The gods are everywhere, lurking in every grove, personifying the river Scamander, meddling in every minor conflict.  And Homer meant it: the gods were no mere allegory for natural forces or innate psychic drives but actors as real as any soldier.   Though of course much more to be feared.  So for the Iliad’s human characters, religion is no Sabbath spiritual exercise but a matter of hard practical necessity.  And their motives often arise from considerations natural to a bronze-age warrior society but completely foreign to ours: pride, or its converse abhorrence of shame, the need to save face even at the expense of the rest of your skin.

And of course another factor making the Iliad occasionally hard-going is the strictures imposed by its origin as a transcribed oral poem.  That is, a lot of repetition and reliance on epithets so that the audience could keep characters straight in their heads over the course of many evenings’ recitation.

But for so many these barriers are easily overcome.  Why?

I think the reason the Iliad still speaks to us so clearly is that no matter how strange the setting or different the characters it is still a fundamentally human story about the most basic relationships and motives.   It’s a story about brothers—-Hector and Paris on the Trojan side, Agamemnon and Menelaus on the Greek, in each case the older brother prosecuting a war on the younger’s behalf. It’s also about fathers and sons; Priam ransoms back his boy, which Achilles surrenders out of respect for his own father.   And while the pride-driven behavior of Aegean warlords occasionally seems inexplicable, Menelaus’ and Achilles’ thirst for revenge, and Hector’s defense of his country, right or wrong, at all costs, are compelling and contemporary.

So I think the Iliad has survived   thirty centuries to remain the cornerstone of Western literature because it first showed us what a story was all about.  It hasn’t changed.

About the author:

Terence Hawkins was born in Uniontown, Pennsylvania, and graduated from Yale. His work has appeared in Poor Mojo’s Almanac(k), Keyhole, Pindeldyboz, Ape Culture, Eclectica, Megaera, the Binnacle, and the New Haven Register. It has also appeared on Connecticut Public Radio. He is a trial lawyer in Connecticut. His website can be found at www.terencehawkins.net.

CONTEST DETAILS

The Prize: a signed copy of The Rage of Achilles, by Terrence Hawkins AND a copy of The War That Killed Achilles, by Carolyn Alexander

The Rules:

• Leave a comment sharing why you think a book becomes a classic
• Make sure your comment includes a way to contact you
• Per the publisher, this contest is open to US residents only
• Contest runs through Nov. 28
• Winner will have 24 hours to respond to the notification email

October ROC Recap November 5, 2010

The Really Old Classics Challenge has hit the half-way mark – how are you doing with your reading goal? Last month I told you that I’d read the preface of Machiavelli’s THE PRINCE; now I’m working on the last third of the book.  It’s really short but there is just so much in there that I don’t want to rush though it.

We have two participants who are going full steam ahead and tearing through books this month, and they are even reading some of the same books!

• My Readers Block read the Dorothy Sayers translation of THE DIVINE COMEDY and gave it 3.5 out of 5 stars.  eclectic/eccentric read the Penguin Classics edition and really appreciated the way Dante made the punishments fit the crimes in his tale.
• My Reader’s Block also read THE CONFERENCE OF THE BIRDS, a play based on the 12th century Iranian mystical poem; unfortunately it wasn’t what she hoped it would be.
• eclectic/eccentricalso took on an adaptation this month: THE PENELOPIAD. Her review includes other books/movies based on Homer’s ODYSSEY.
• And finally, My Reader’s Block tackled GILGAMESH.  She called it “one of the finest and most accessible early classic translations that I have read.”

There are two more months left in this challenge – plenty of time to read just ONE Really Old Classic!  Good luck.

Reminder & A Winner October 26, 2010

Reminder: If you have read a book for the Really Old Classics Challenge this month, be sure to post your link on the 2010 Reviews page. I’m putting together a recap of this month’s reviews shortly and I’d love to include yours!

A Winner: Congratulations to Trisha @ eclectic/eccentric! She won a copy of Laurel Corona’s new book Penelope’s Daughter in our contest.  I hope you enjoy the book Trisha!

Did Odysseus Have a Daughter? Why Not? October 7, 2010

Please welcome Laurel Corona, author of Penelope’s Daughter.  Check out her reasons for “messing with” one of Homer’s epics and her thoughts on the absence of realistic women in these kinds of stories.  Then read on for the chance to win a copy of her book  for yourself!

Recently a number of authors have spun off new novels from classics, focusing on secondary characters or imagining what happened later to a much beloved one.  This is fun idea, because I think everyone who falls in love with a book doesn’t want it to end.

In the case of a work everyone knows was fiction to begin with, like Pride and Prejudice or Jane Eyre, it’s easy to go with the flow. Elizabeth Bennet and Jane were inventions, so why can’t their stories continue? I frequently get asked what happened next to Chiaretta, one of the sisters in my book, The Four Seasons: A Novel of Vivaldi’s Venice.  It’s always struck me as a strange question, because how would I know?  Really the reader’s answer is as good as mine, and I always say I view Chiaretta as someone I used to know whom I now have lost track of.

For that reason, my partner’s reaction to my idea for a novel based on the Odyssey struck me as odd. “What do you think about Penelope being pregnant with a daughter when Odysseus goes off to the Trojan War,” I asked, “a daughter he doesn’t even know exists?”

“You can’t mess with Homer!” he replied.

“Why not?” I asked.  I realize now, although I couldn’t put my finger on it at the time, that he and many others see Homer’s work as history–at least on a basic level, despite all the monsters and gods. If Odysseus really existed, I couldn’t just go around adding people to his family, because I had an obligation to the essential facts of the story.

I see my partner’s point, although I was always inclined to see the story of the Odyssey as fiction, and therefore fair game. But the deeper I dug into the epic poem itself, the more convinced I became that Homer (and, to be fair, the earlier bards from whom he got his tales) would not have seen a daughter as relevant, so even if she existed, she would not have merited a mention.

To Homer, women are relevant for two reasons.  The first is that they make trouble for men. In many cases the whole story is about that trouble (think of Circe turning men to swine, or Helen and her fabled trip to Troy). The second reason is that occasionally a woman behaves ideally, at least from a male perspective, and she must be singled out for admiration.  Clearly to Homer, Penelope is this type. I read the Odyssey over and over while I was working on Penelope’s Daughter, and I got really tired of seeing Penelope do literally nothing but weep bitter tears and bemoan her fate. All she wanted was to have her man back, and she would never—NEVER!—be unfaithful to him.

“Come on!” I found myself saying. Odysseus is gone for nearly twenty years—wouldn’t tears get a bit old, especially for a husband she barely had time to get to know?  It is, I think, a much cherished fantasy that a love left behind would cry her (or his) eyes out forever, but it’s important to remember that Penelope was probably early in her teens when she married, and she had only enough time to produce a one-year-old son before her husband left for two decades. Two, maybe three years together, nineteen apart—how much about him could she honestly remember?

My guess is that, if the story of Penelope is true, she spent those years as a productive, effective queen.  As she matured, she found her voice and her power. That’s the Penelope I pictured as I wrote. Though the novel tells the story of her daughter Xanthe, one of my favorite things about writing it was getting to explore Penelope’s story from a perspective more realistic, affirmative—and likely—than Homer’s.

Off the top of my head, I recall four women in the Odyssey, other than servants and goddesses: Penelope, Anticleia (Odysseus’ mother), Helen, and Helen’s daughter Hermione, who merits a few lines when she gets married (one of the few important things women do).  A few other women are mentioned, and Penelope’s sister’s spirit appears in one scene. Homer never got real. We’re one half of the population in real life, if rarely so in epic stories. The lack of variety in women’s personalities and activities doesn’t mean they didn’t have that variety.

My work as a historical novelist is focused on hearing the whispers of forgotten women and telling their stories.  I became convinced as I wrote that Odysseus and Penelope really did have a daughter, and by the time I finished the book, I thought it odd to read the text and not see her name, because I knew she was there.  I hope readers of Penelope’s Daughter will feel the same.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Giveaway Details

• Leave a comment on this post for a chance to win a copy of Penelope’s Daughter; be sure to include your email address if it is not available through your blog or profile.
• Contest is open to those with US/Canadian mailing addresses, per the publisher.
• Winner will be selected using Random.org on October 25 and notified via email.
• Winner will have 48 hours to respond in order to claim the prize.  If the original winner does not respond by the deadline, a new winner will be selected.

ROC’s in September? September 29, 2010

I know it is only the first month of the challenge but did anyone complete a Really Old Classic in September?  If so, be sure to add your link to the 2010 Review page (look for that tab at the top of the challenge blog).

As for me, I decided to revisit an old favorite: Machiavelli’s The Prince.  (Of course I haven’t actually started reading it yet…) I may also add a few other ROCs if I feel like I can fit them in.

If you haven’t finished a book, let me know in the comments what you’ve started or what you plan to read!

Coming soon! August 30, 2010

The 2010 Really Old Classics Challenge is coming on Sept. 1.  You can sign up now, so get crackin’!